The neural representation of human versus nonhuman bipeds and quadrupeds

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The neural representation of human versus nonhuman bipeds and quadrupeds

Citable link to this page


Title: The neural representation of human versus nonhuman bipeds and quadrupeds
Author: Papeo, Liuba; Wurm, Moritz F.; Oosterhof, Nikolaas N.; Caramazza, Alfonso

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Papeo, Liuba, Moritz F. Wurm, Nikolaas N. Oosterhof, and Alfonso Caramazza. 2017. “The neural representation of human versus nonhuman bipeds and quadrupeds.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 14040. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14424-7.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: How do humans recognize humans among other creatures? Recent studies suggest that a preference for conspecifics may emerge already in perceptual processing, in regions such as the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), implicated in visual perception of biological motion. In the current functional MRI study, participants viewed point-light displays of human and nonhuman creatures moving in their typical bipedal (man and chicken) or quadrupedal mode (crawling-baby and cat). Stronger activity for man and chicken versus baby and cat was found in the right pSTS responsive to biological motion. The novel effect of pedalism suggests that, if right pSTS contributes to recognizing of conspecifics, it does so by detecting perceptual features (e.g. bipedal motion) that reliably correlate with their appearance. A searchlight multivariate pattern analysis could decode humans and nonhumans across pedalism in the left pSTS and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex. This result implies a categorical human-nonhuman distinction, independent from within-category physical/perceptual variation. Thus, recognizing conspecifics involves visual classification based on perceptual features that most frequently co-occur with humans, such as bipedalism, and retrieval of information that determines category membership above and beyond visual appearance. The current findings show that these processes are at work in separate brain networks.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14424-7
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search