Therapeutic Evolution or Revolution? Metaphors and Their Consequences
Citation
Jones, David S. 2016. Therapeutic Evolution or Revolution? Metaphors and Their Consequences. In Therapeutic Revolutions: Pharmaceuticals and Social Change in the Twentieth Century, eds Jeremy A. Greene, Flurin Condrau, and Elizabeth Siegel Watkins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Abstract
Evolution and revolution are both models of change over time. It is easy to see the appeal of a claim of revolution for scientists and for their historians: it pronounces a radical break from the past, confident and triumphant. Progress is implied by the decisiveness of the rupture. Such rhetoric is good for marketing, especially when contrasted against the cautious gradualism of evolution. But evolution has its own appeals, especially its reassuring connotations of progressive improvement. It is not enough simply to debate what counts, or not, as revolution or evolution. Instead, much can be gained through serious engagement with the theory and language of revolution and evolution in pursuit of the best possible accounts of scientific change.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34639494
Collections
- SPH Scholarly Articles [6362]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)