Improving the evaluation of cardiac function in rats at 7T with denoising filters: a comparison study

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Improving the evaluation of cardiac function in rats at 7T with denoising filters: a comparison study

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Improving the evaluation of cardiac function in rats at 7T with denoising filters: a comparison study
Author: Tricot, Benoit; Descoteaux, Maxime; Dumont, Matthieu; Chagnon, Frederic; Tremblay, Luc; Carpentier, André; Lesur, Olivier; Lepage, Martin; Lalande, Alain

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Tricot, Benoit, Maxime Descoteaux, Matthieu Dumont, Frederic Chagnon, Luc Tremblay, André Carpentier, Olivier Lesur, Martin Lepage, and Alain Lalande. 2017. “Improving the evaluation of cardiac function in rats at 7T with denoising filters: a comparison study.” BMC Medical Imaging 17 (1): 62. doi:10.1186/s12880-017-0236-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0236-2.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: We investigate the use of different denoising filters on low signal-to-noise ratio cardiac images of the rat heart acquired with a birdcage volume coil at 7T. Accuracy and variability of cardiac function parameters were measured from manual segmentation of rat heart images with and without filtering. Methods: Ten rats were studied using a 7T Varian system. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, ejection fraction and left ventricle mass (LVM) were calculated from manual segmentation by two experts on cine-FLASH short-axis slices covering the left ventricle. Series were denoised with an anisotropic diffusion filter, a whole variation regularization or an optimized Rician non-local means (ORNLM) filtering technique. The effect of the different filters was evaluated by the calculation of signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios, followed by a study of intra- and inter-expert variability of the measurement of physiological parameters. The calculated LVM was compared to the LVM obtained by weighing the heart ex vivo. Results: The SNR and the CNR increased after application of the different filters. The performance of the ORNLM filter was superior for all the parameters of the cardiac function, as judged from the inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Moreover, this filtering technique resulted in the lowest variability in the LVM evaluation. Conclusions: In cardiac MRI of rats, filtering is an interesting alternative that yields better contrast between myocardium and surrounding tissues and the ORNLM filter provided the largest improvements.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/s12880-017-0236-2
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735834/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34651868
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters