Mathematical modeling identifies optimum lapatinib dosing schedules for the treatment of glioblastoma patients

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Mathematical modeling identifies optimum lapatinib dosing schedules for the treatment of glioblastoma patients

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Mathematical modeling identifies optimum lapatinib dosing schedules for the treatment of glioblastoma patients
Author: Stein, Shayna; Zhao, Rui; Haeno, Hiroshi; Vivanco, Igor; Michor, Franziska

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Stein, Shayna, Rui Zhao, Hiroshi Haeno, Igor Vivanco, and Franziska Michor. 2018. “Mathematical modeling identifies optimum lapatinib dosing schedules for the treatment of glioblastoma patients.” PLoS Computational Biology 14 (1): e1005924. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005924.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Human primary glioblastomas (GBM) often harbor mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Treatment of EGFR-mutant GBM cell lines with the EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib can effectively induce cell death in these models. However, EGFR inhibitors have shown little efficacy in the clinic, partly because of inappropriate dosing. Here, we developed a computational approach to model the in vitro cellular dynamics of the EGFR-mutant cell line SF268 in response to different lapatinib concentrations and dosing schedules. We then used this approach to identify an effective treatment strategy within the clinical toxicity limits of lapatinib, and developed a partial differential equation modeling approach to study the in vivo GBM treatment response by taking into account the heterogeneous and diffusive nature of the disease. Despite the inability of lapatinib to induce tumor regressions with a continuous daily schedule, our modeling approach consistently predicts that continuous dosing remains the best clinically feasible strategy for slowing down tumor growth and lowering overall tumor burden, compared to pulsatile schedules currently known to be tolerated, even when considering drug resistance, reduced lapatinib tumor concentrations due to the blood brain barrier, and the phenotypic switch from proliferative to migratory cell phenotypes that occurs in hypoxic microenvironments. Our mathematical modeling and statistical analysis platform provides a rational method for comparing treatment schedules in search for optimal dosing strategies for glioblastoma and other cancer types.
Published Version: doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005924
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766249/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34869018
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters