Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity
Author: Cushing, Cody A.; Im, Hee Yeon; Adams, Reginald B.; Ward, Noreen; Albohn, Daniel N.; Steiner, Troy G.; Kveraga, Kestutis

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Cushing, Cody A., Hee Yeon Im, Reginald B. Adams, Noreen Ward, Daniel N. Albohn, Troy G. Steiner, and Kestutis Kveraga. 2018. “Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity.” Scientific Reports 8 (1): 2776. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confirmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased significantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly affects the onset and duration of these stages.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5807432/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:35014522
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters