Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWesten, Drew
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-26T19:07:35Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationWesten, Drew, and Robert Rosenthal. 2003. Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, no. 3: 608-618.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3708469
dc.description.abstractConstruct validity is one of the most central concepts in psychology. Researchers generally establish the construct validity of a measure by correlating it with a number of other measures and arguing from the pattern of correlations that the measure is associated with these variables in theoretically predictable ways. This article presents 2 simple metrics for quantifying construct validity that provide effect size estimates indicating the extent to which the observed pattern of correlations in a convergent-discriminant validity matrix matches the theoretically predicted pattern of correlations. Both measures. based oil contrast analysis, provide simple estimates of validity that can be compared across studies, constructs. and measures meta-analytic ally, and can be implemented without the use of complex statistical procedures that may limit their accessibility.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychologyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.608en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleQuantifying Construct Validity: Two Simple Measuresen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyen_US
dash.depositing.authorRosenthal, Robert
dc.date.available2010-02-26T19:07:35Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.608*
dash.contributor.affiliatedRosenthal, Robert


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record