Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPritchett, Lant
dc.contributor.authorSamji, Salimah
dc.contributor.authorHammer, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T17:00:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationPritchett, Lant, Salimah Samji, and Jeffrey Hammer. “It’s All About MeE: Using Structured Experiential Learning (‘e’) to Crawl the Design Space.” CID Working Paper Series 2012.249, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, December 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366274*
dc.description.abstractThere is an inherent tension between implementing organizations—which have specific objectives and narrow missions and mandates—and executive organizations—which provide resources to multiple implementing organizations. Ministries of finance/planning/budgeting allocate across ministries and projects/programmes within ministries, development organizations allocate across sectors (and countries), foundations or philanthropies allocate across programmes/grantees. Implementing organizations typically try to do the best they can with the funds they have and attract more resources, while executive organizations have to decide what and who to fund. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) has always been an element of the accountability of implementing organizations to their funders. There has been a recent trend towards much greater rigor in evaluations to isolate causal impacts of projects and programmes and more ‘evidence base’ approaches to accountability and budget allocations. Here we extend the basic idea of rigorous impact evaluation—the use of a valid counter-factual to make judgments about causality—to emphasize that the techniques of impact evaluation can be directly useful to implementing organizations (as opposed to impact evaluation being seen by implementing organizations as only an external threat to their funding). We introduce structured experiential learning (which we add to M&E to get MeE) which allows implementing agencies to actively and rigorously search across alternative project designs using the monitoring data that provides real time performance information with direct feedback into the decision loops of project design and implementation. Our argument is that within-project variations in design can serve as their own counter-factual and this dramatically reduces the incremental cost of evaluation and increases the direct usefulness of evaluation to implementing agencies. The right combination of M, e, and E provides the right space for innovation and organizational capability building while at the same time providing accountability and an evidence base for funding agencies.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for International Development at Harvard Universityen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publicationsen_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleIt’s All About MeE: Using Structured Experiential Learning (‘e’) to Crawl the Design Spaceen_US
dc.typeResearch Paper or Reporten_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalCID Working Paper Seriesen_US
dc.date.available2020-11-18T17:00:01Z
dash.contributor.affiliatedSamji, Salimah
dash.contributor.affiliatedPritchett, Lant


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record