Does Elite Capture Matter? Local Elites and Targeted Welfare Programs in Indonesia
Olken, Benjamin A.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHanna, Rema, Vivi Alatas, Abhijit Banerjee, Benjamin A. Olken, Ririn Purnamasari, and Matthew Wai-Poi. “Does Elite Capture Matter: Local Elites and Targeted Welfare Programs in Indonesia.” CID Working Paper Series 2013.255, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, January 2013.
AbstractThis paper investigates the impact of elite capture on the allocation of targeted government welfare programs in Indonesia, using both a high-stakes field experiment that varied the extent of elite influence and non-experimental data on a variety of existing government transfer programs. Conditional on their consumption level, there is little evidence that village elites and their relatives are more likely to receive aid programs than non-elites. Looking more closely, however, we find that this overall result masks a difference between different types of elites: those holding formal leadership positions are more likely to receive benefits, while informal leaders are actually less likely to. We show that capture by formal elites occurs during the distribution of benefits under the programs, and not during the processes when the beneficiary lists are determined by the central government. However, while elite capture exists, the welfare losses it creates appear quite small: since formal elites and their relatives are only 9 percent richer than non-elites, are at most about 8 percentage points more likely to receive benefits than non-elites, and represent at most 15 percent of the population, eliminating elite capture entirely would improve the welfare gains from these programs by less than one percent.
Citable link to this pagehttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366281