Impact of an Automated Test Results Management System on Patients' Satisfaction About Test Result Communication
Impact of an Automated Test Results Management System on Patients' Satisfaction About Test Result Communication.pdf (303.5Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Bates, David W.
Kuperman, Gilad J.
Poon, Eric G.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationMatheny, Michael E., Tejal K. Gandhi, E. John Orav, Zahra Ladak-Merchant, David W. Bates, Gilad J. Kuperman, and Eric G. Poon. 2007. "Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication." Archives of internal medicine 167, no. 20: 2233-2239.
AbstractBackground: Few reliable and efficient systems sup- port the communication of test results to outpatients, and this may lead to patient dissatisfaction with test result communication. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of physicians’ use of a test results management tool embedded in an electronic health record on patient satisfaction with test result communication.
Methods: A prospective, cluster-randomized, con- trolled trial of 570 patient encounters in 26 outpatient primary care practices was performed from December 1, 2002, to April 31, 2005. Physicians in the intervention practices were trained and given access to a physician test results management tool with imbedded patient notification functions to evaluate whether patient satisfaction with communication of test results ordered by the primary care provider was improved. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted by telephone after the patient underwent the test and were administered before and after the intervention in both arms.
Results: The survey response rate after successful patient contact was 74.2% (570/768). After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and insurance type, the intervention significantly increased patient satisfaction with test results communication (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.25; P=.03). In addition, patients in the postintervention group were more satisfied with information given them for medical treatments and conditions regarding their results (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-9.17; P = .02).
Conclusion: An automated test results management system can improve patient satisfaction with communication of test results ordered by their primary care provider and can improve patient satisfaction with the communication of information regarding their condition and treatment plans.
Citable link to this pagehttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367047
- SPH Scholarly Articles