The presence of unexpected biases in online fact-checking
Author
Park, S.
Park, J.Y.
Kang, J.
Cha, M.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-53Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Park, S., J.Y. Park, J. Kang, M. Cha. "The presence of unexpected biases in online fact-checking." The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2, no. 1 (2021). DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-53Abstract
The increasing amount of information online makes it challenging to judge what to believe or discredit. Fact-checking unverified claims shared on platforms, like social media, can play a critical role in correcting misbeliefs. The current study demonstrates how the effect of fact-checking can vary by several factors. We show that fact-checking helps self-correct one's views among young adults. However, this effect is weaker for individuals who perceived the claim negatively at first. Furthermore, borderline messages like “Lack of Evidence” can be perceived as false rather than neutral. We explain these biases via human cognitive mechanisms that avoid risk and uncertainty.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367204
Collections
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)