Tracing Architectural Authorship through the Archive of Indian Modernist Achyut Kanvinde
20210520 Vrinda Thesis Final Document.pdf (32.23Mb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationKanvinde, Vrinda. 2021. Tracing Architectural Authorship through the Archive of Indian Modernist Achyut Kanvinde. Master's thesis, Harvard Graduate School of Design.
AbstractIndependence from British rule for several colonies was not just a political and ideological phenomenon, but also spatially articulated through modernism. In India, the adoption of the International style was symbolic of a shedding of identity tied to a colonial past. Nehru, often lauded as the “architect” of modern India for his development of science and technology in a bid to catch up to the modern west, sent young professionals abroad for further studies to America and England. They were to be tasked with rebuilding a new, “modern” nation on returning. One such architect was A. P. Kanvinde, who studied at Harvard under the instruction of Walter Gropius in 1946.
This thesis positions itself in the growing body of work that attempts to subvert the west-dominated canonical reading of modernism, instead trying to bring in counter-narratives from the third world. In looking at Kanvinde’s work, it examines architecture and authorship, not just through the development of style and quest for an “Indian” identity, but also through questioning the trope of the architects as heroic figures and asking if they can truly be sole authors. Works of architecture come out of a process of collaboration, and are implicitly shaped by socio-political context, and by constraints such as site, climate, and budget. These inquiries into the process of architectural production are made through the project of the National Science Centre, New Delhi.
This thesis deals with the twofold theoretical problems of an incomplete archive and proximity to subject matter, by reexamining the accepted way of conceiving of and writing history, to instead include personal oral histories and written correspondence to supplement the material archive of written works and architectural drawings.
Citable link to this pagehttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367895