Is (S)He Presidential? The Changing Scripts of Political Leadership, 1995-2020
View/ Open
BYPark_Dissertation_Final Manuscript Submitted to ProQuest.pdf (6.960Mb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Author
Park, Bo Yun
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Park, Bo Yun. 2021. Is (S)He Presidential? The Changing Scripts of Political Leadership, 1995-2020. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.Abstract
This dissertation investigates how political strategists craft narratives of political leadership for presidential candidates in the digital age. Based on 110 in-depth interviews with high-profile political operatives in France and the United States, complemented by observational case studies of their professional meetings, I find that American and French political strategists craft scripts of presidential leadership by 1) drawing on models of leadership that tap into conventional collective imaginaries around presidential leadership, 2) adapting to the new structural and cultural changes associated with the spread of social media and big data analytics, and 3) reconfiguring their scripts of presidential leadership so that they may better resonate in today’s digital age. While political strategists in France had followed a hierarchical model of leadership and their American counterparts channeled a more egalitarian type of authority, the spread of social media and data analytics has been pushing strategists in both countries to reorient their scripts and strategies toward a new model of leadership: the entrepreneurial president. In doing so, the political strategists’ use of new technologies and modes of political communication serves as a catalyst for changing the scripts of presidential leadership they use. This research contributes to a better understanding of the changes in political repertoires and practices used in presidential campaigns. It also unveils the collective imaginaries that presidential candidates ought to speak to in a period of accentuated political polarization, resurging populism, and vastly changing demographics.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37370206
Collections
- FAS Theses and Dissertations [7063]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)