Interventions to Improve Adherence and Persistence With Osteoporosis Medications: A Systematic Literature Review
View/ Open
nihms347742.pdf (429.3Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Author
Gleeson, T.
Brookhart, A. M.
May, F.
Patrick, A. R.
Solomon, Daniel Hal
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0976-0Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Gleeson, T., M. D. Iversen, J. Avorn, A. M. Brookhart, J. N. Katz, E. Losina, F. May, A. R. Patrick, W. H. Shrank, and D. H. Solomon. 2009. Interventions to Improve Adherence and Persistence with Osteoporosis Medications: a Systematic Literature Review. Osteoporos Int 20, no. 12: 2127–2134. doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0976-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0976-0.Abstract
Summary: Adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications are poor. We conducted a systematic literature review of interventions to improve adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications. Seven studies met eligibility requirements and were included in the review. Few interventions were efficacious, and no clear trends regarding successful intervention techniques were identified. However, periodic follow-up interaction between patients and health professionals appeared to be beneficial. Introduction: Adherence and persistence with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis are suboptimal. Our goal was to examine the design and efficacy of published interventions to improve adherence and persistence. Methods: We searched medical literature databases for English-language papers published between January 1990 and July 2008. We selected papers that described interventions and provided results for control and intervention subjects. We assessed the design and methods of each study, including randomization, blinding, and reporting of drop-outs. We summarized the results and calculated effect sizes for each trial. Results: Seven studies met eligibility requirements and were included in the review. Five of the seven studies provided adherence data. Of those five studies, three showed a statistically significant (p≤0.05) improvement in adherence by the intervention group, with effect sizes from 0.17 to 0.58. Five of the seven studies provided persistence data. Of those five, one reported statistically significant improvement in persistence by the intervention group, with an effect size of 0.36. Conclusions: Few interventions were efficacious, and no clear trends regarding successful intervention techniques were identified in this small sample of studies. However, periodic follow-up interaction between patients and health professionals appeared to be beneficial.Other Sources
http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19499273/Citable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37370429
Collections
- HMS Scholarly Articles [17875]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)