Liability threshold modeling of case–control status and family history of disease increases association power
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Hujoel, Margaux L. A.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHujoel, Margaux L. A., Steven Gazal, Po-Ru Loh, Nick Patterson, Alkes Price. "Liability threshold modeling of case–control status and family history of disease increases association power." Nature Genetics 52, no. 5 (2020): 541-547. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0613-6
AbstractFamily history of disease can provide valuable information in case-control association studies, but it is currently unclear how to best combine case-control status and family history of disease. We developed an association method based on posterior mean genetic liabilities under a liability threshold model, conditional on case-control status and family history (LT-FH). Analyzing 12 diseases from the UK Biobank (average N=350K), we compared LT-FH to genome-wide association without using family history (GWAS) and a previous proxy-based method incorporating family history (GWAX). LT-FH was +63% (s.e. 6%) more powerful than GWAS and +36% (s.e. 4%) more powerful than the trait-specific maximum of GWAS and GWAX, based on the number of independent genome-wide significant loci across all diseases (e.g. 690 loci for LT-FH vs. 423 for GWAS); relative improvements were similar when applying BOLT-LMM to GWAS, GWAX, LT-FH phenotypes. Thus, LT-FH greatly increases association power when family history of disease is available.
Citable link to this pagehttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37371894
- SPH Scholarly Articles 
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)