Treatment Outcomes of Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depressed Patients With and Without Borderline Personality Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Study
View/ Open
ect_bpd_agyip_figure01_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (62.55Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_figure02_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (280.7Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_table01_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (40.92Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_table02_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (15.11Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_text_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (272.8Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_supplfig1_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (140.2Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_suppltable01_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (32.00Kb)
ect_bpd_agyip_suppltable02_jclinpsychiatry_revision.pdf (60.84Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Author
Yip, Agustin G.
Siddiqi, Shan H.
Seiner, Steven J.
Seiner
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.19m13202Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Yip, Agustin G, Kerry J Ressler, Fernando Rodriguez-Villa, Shan H Siddiqi, and Steven J Seiner. 2021. “Treatment Outcomes of Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depressed Patients With and Without Borderline Personality Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 82 (2). https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.19m13202.Abstract
Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold-standard treatment for refractory depression. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is generally considered a poor predictor of treatment response. We sought to assess symptom-severity outcomes among depressed patients, with and without BPD, undergoing acute phase ECT.Methods: The study sample consisted of at least moderately depressed patients who received an acute course of ECT from January 2011 to December 2016 at a freestanding psychiatric hospital. Participants completed a DSM-IV-validated BPD screening instrument (MSI-BPD) at baseline. Measures of DSM-IV depressive symptom severity (QIDS-SR) were taken serially on four occasions. Outcomes of interest comprised total QIDS-SR score trajectory, as well as QIDS-SR suicidality subscore and symptom clusters posited to differentiate response among antidepressant treatments.
Results: 693 individuals met study inclusion criteria, 145 (20.9%) of whom screened positive for BPD. Overall, ECT was associated with significant improvement of depressive symptoms (χ2(1) = 504.8, p < 0.0001). Despite differing from BPD(-) individuals on key baseline features, BPD(+) individuals responded to ECT with similar improvement in overall depression severity (χ2(1) = 0.22, p = 0.64), suicidality (χ2(1) = 1.63, p = 0.20), and core emotional (χ2(1) = 0.63, p = 0.43), sleep (χ2(1) = 0.20, p = 0.65), and atypical (χ2(1) = 1.30, p = 0.25) symptoms after 15 treatments. Post hoc analysis indicates a slightly less robust overall response among BPD(+) by the 15th treatment.
Conclusion: Acute course ECT benefits depressed patients, with or without co-morbid BPD, although patients with BPD may exhibit less pronounced improvement over time.
Key words: electroconvulsive therapy, borderline personality disorder, depression
Citable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37373116
Collections
- HMS Scholarly Articles [17714]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)