Private Paternalism, the Commitment Puzzle, and Model-Free Equilibrium
View/ Open
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181124Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Laibson, David. 2018. Private Paternalism, the Commitment Puzzle, and Model-Free Equilibrium (Richard T. Ely Lecture). American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 108: 1-21.Abstract
Paternalism is a policy that advances an individual's interests by restricting his or her freedom. In a setting with present-biased agents, I characterize the scope of private paternalism—paternalism implemented by private institutions. Private paternalism arises from two channels: (i) agents who seek commitment because they hold sophisticated beliefs about their present bias, and (ii) agents (naive or sophisticated) who use model-free forecasts to choose organizations that have a history of generating high experienced utility flows for their members (O'Donoghue and Rabin 1999b). When naive consumers are common, private paternalism will be shrouded, explaining why commitment mechanisms are typically shrouded in the labor market (the commitment puzzle). Private paternalism has greater traction when production occurs in the formal sector instead of the informal (household) sector, where monitors are not always present, able, or willing to implement socially efficient forcing mechanisms.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37373773
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17837]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)