Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Beth
dc.contributor.authorPevehouse, Jon
dc.contributor.authorRogowski, Ron
dc.contributor.authorTingley, Dustin
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Rick
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-19T15:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2013-01
dc.identifier.citationMiller, Beth, Jon Pevehouse, Ron Rogowski, Dustin Tingley, and Rick Wilson. 2013. “How To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Recent and Soon-to-Be PhDs.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (1): 120–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909651200128x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-0965en_US
dc.identifier.issn1537-5935en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:38057810*
dc.description.abstractPeer review is central to political science. In this article we collect the ideas of journal editors in political science and several recent PhDs, who met as a panel at the 2011 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting to discuss the principles of the review process. This includes why reviewing is important to the development of one's own scholarship but also offers some nuts and bolts on reviewing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernmenten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleHow To Be a Peer Reviewer: A Guide for Recent and Soon-to-be PhDsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalPS: Political Science & Politicsen_US
dash.depositing.authorTingley, Dustin
dc.date.available2019-01-19T15:53:50Z
dash.affiliation.otherFaculty of Arts & Sciencesen_US
dash.workflow.comments1Science Serial ID 84134en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s104909651200128x
dc.source.journalAPSC
dash.source.volume46;01
dash.source.page120-123
dash.contributor.affiliatedTingley, Dustin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record