• Login
View Item 
  • DASH Home
  • Harvard Kennedy School
  • HKS Center for International Development
  • View Item
  • DASH Home
  • Harvard Kennedy School
  • HKS Center for International Development
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DASH
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Author
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • FAS Department
This Collection
  • By Issue Date
  • Author
  • Title
  • Keyword

Submitters

  • Login
  • Quick submit
  • Waiver Generator

About

  • About DASH
  • DASH Stories
  • DASH FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • COVID-related Research
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Statistics

  • By Schools
  • By Collections
  • By Departments
  • By Items
  • By Country
  • By Authors

A Trojan Horse Behind Chinese Walls?: Problems and Prospects of US-Sponsored “Rule of Law” Reform Projects in the People’s Republic China

 
Thumbnail
View/Open
047.pdf (380.6Kb)
Author
Stephenson, Matthew C.
Published Version
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Stephenson, Matthew C. “A Trojan Horse Behind Chinese Walls?: Problems and Prospects of US-Sponsored “Rule of Law” Reform Projects in the People’s Republic China.” CID Working Paper Series 2000.47, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, May 2000.
Abstract
The US government has announced an initiative to promote the “rule of law” in the People’s Republic of China. However, though China has also endorsed building the “rule of law” as a goal, the American and Chinese views of what “rule of law” entails differ substantially. In the US government, rule of law reform is seen as a way to promote human rights and political reform, whereas the Chinese government wants to restrict law reform to those areas closely related to developing a market economy. To deal with this divergence in goals, the US has adopted a “Trojan Horse” strategy: the belief is that the Chinese will allow US-sponsored law reform programs for economic reasons, but once established, these programs will lead to broader political reform. However, this view is not well-supported by theory or empirical evidence. Thus, while law reform programs in China may be worthwhile, we should be skeptical of their ability to trigger more fundamental political reform.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:39546923

Collections
  • HKS Center for International Development [541]

Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)

e: osc@harvard.edu

t: +1 (617) 495 4089

Creative Commons license‌Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given. For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy ©2022 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Contact
  • Harvard Library
  • Harvard University