Prevalence-Induced Concept Change in Human Judgment
Author
Levari, David Emmanuel
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Levari, David Emmanuel. 2018. Prevalence-Induced Concept Change in Human Judgment. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.Abstract
Why do social problems seem so intractable? In a series of experiments, I show that people often respond to decreases in the prevalence of a stimulus by “expanding their concept” of it. When blue dots became rare, participants began to see purple dots as blue; when threatening faces became rare, participants began to see neutral faces as threatening; and when unethical requests became rare, participants began to see innocuous requests as unethical. This prevalence-induced concept change occurred even when participants were forewarned about it and even when they were instructed and paid to resist it. I then present a computational model suggesting that this phenomenon is driven by a range-frequency compromise in judgment. One reason social problems may seem so intractable is that a reduction in their prevalence can lead people to see more of them.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41127358
Collections
- FAS Theses and Dissertations [6136]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)