Dependence on Persons and Dependence on Things in Rousseau's Social, Psychological, and Aesthetic Theory
DAVIES-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf (2.125Mb)(embargoed until: 2022-05-01)
MetadataShow full item record
CitationDavies, Byron. 2018. Dependence on Persons and Dependence on Things in Rousseau's Social, Psychological, and Aesthetic Theory. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.
AbstractJean-Jacques Rousseau is often associated with a certain political form of relating to another as a person, where a person is seen as a locus of enforceable demands. Nevertheless, as I argue in this dissertation, Rousseau also articulated an affective form of relating to another, where relating to another as a person in this sense involves seeing them as a locus of a kind of value that cannot be demanded. I consider the significance of this affective form for Rousseau’s understanding of the passion he calls amour-propre, as well for his understanding of domination and of the connection between the political and affective realms.
Following an introductory chapter, I argue in Chapter 2 (‘Amour-Propre and Seeing Others as Persons 1: The Sauvage’) and Chapter 3 (‘Amour-Propre and Seeing Others as Persons 2: Society’) that, against received readings of Rousseau, there is something intrinsically good about being subject to amour-propre (or the desire for consideration from others) in that this passion makes salient to us others’ personhood (in the affective sense).
In Chapter 4 (‘Domination and Personhood’) I consider one way in which the characteristic pathology of the affective realm is the appearance of demands in it. I show how, in a certain kind of domination, the dominator acknowledges the affective personhood of the dominated and at the same time, by treating the dominated’s consideration as the sort of value that can be extracted, is in violation of the very conditions of that acknowledgment.
In Chapter 5 (‘Political and Affective Forms of Relating to Another’) I outline Rousseau’s understanding of the connection between the political and affective forms of relating to another by arguing that Rousseau introduces the former as an essential part of the egalitarian measures he proposes for eliminating the necessity of entering relationships of domination. I then contrast Rousseau’s understanding of the connection between the political and the affective realms with contemporary Kantian accounts that condense political and affective phenomena into a single conception of a person.
In Appendix 1 (‘Speech, Recognition, and the Insult in Not Being Believed: Rousseau and Adam Smith’) I consider the kind of dependence on another person (in the affective sense) involved in speaking to them. I discuss how that dependence is made apparent when we are insulted in not being believed, and I compare the views of Rousseau and Adam Smith regarding that kind of insult.
Finally, in Appendix 2 (‘Spectators and Giants in Rousseau and Víctor Erice’) I bring Rousseau’s notion of acknowledging another as a person (in the affective sense) to bear on an interpretation of the work of the Spanish filmmaker Víctor Erice (The Spirit of the Beehive, El Sur).
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41127976
- FAS Theses and Dissertations