Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
7155 ajcn965977.pdf (153.4Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Leung, Cindy W.
Ding, Eric L.
Catalano, Paul J.
Rimm, Eric Bruce::0ab2926c8242f35e5a982e3cf59f4987::600
Willett, Walter C.::94559ea206eef8a8844fc5b80654fa5b::600
MetadataShow full item record
CitationLeung, Cindy W, Eric L Ding, Paul J Catalano, Eduardo Villamor, Eric B Rimm, and Walter C Willett. 2012. “Dietary Intake and Dietary Quality of Low-Income Adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 96 (5): 977–88. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.040014.
AbstractBackground: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) aims to alleviate hunger among its beneficiaries by providing benefits to purchase nutritious foods. Objective: We conducted a comprehensive dietary analysis of low-income adults and examined differences in dietary intake between SNAP participants and nonparticipants. Design: The study population comprised 3835 nonelderly adults with a household income <= 130% of the federal poverty level from the 1999-2008 NHANES. The National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate the distributions of usual intake for dietary outcomes. Relative differences in dietary intake by SNAP participation were estimated with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and household food security. Results: Few low-income adults consumed recommended amounts of whole grains, fruit, vegetables, fish, and nuts/seeds/legumes. Conversely, many low-income adults exceeded recommended limits for processed meats, sweets, and bakery desserts and sugar-sweetened beverages. Approximately 13-22% of low-income adults did not meet any food and nutrient guidelines; virtually no adults met all of the guidelines. Compared with nonparticipants, SNAP participants consumed 39% fewer whole grains (95% CI: -57%, -15%), 44% more 100% fruit juice (95% CI: 0%, 107%), 56% more potatoes (95% CI: 18%, 106%), 46% more red meat (95% CI: 4%, 106%), and, in women, 61% more sugar-sweetened beverages (95% CI: 3%, 152%). SNAP participants also had lower dietary quality scores than did nonparticipants, as measured by a modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Conclusion: Although the diets of all low-income adults need major improvement, SNAP participants in particular had lower-quality diets than did income-eligible nonparticipants. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:977-88.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41249166
- SPH Scholarly Articles