Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrady, Timothy F.
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, George
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T14:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationBrady, Timothy F., and George A. Alvarez. "No Evidence for a Fixed Object Limit in Working Memory: Spatial Ensemble Representations Inflate Estimates of Working Memory Capacity for Complex Objects." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41, no. 3 (2015): 921-29.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-1285en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-7393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41364299*
dc.description.abstractA central question for models of visual working memory is whether the number of objects people can remember depends on object complexity. Some influential "slot" models of working memory capacity suggest that people always represent 3-4 objects and that only the fidelity with which these objects are represented is affected by object complexity. The primary evidence supporting this claim is the finding that people can detect large changes to complex objects (consistent with remembering at least 4 individual objects), but that small changes cannot be detected (consistent with low-resolution representations). Here we show that change detection with large changes greatly overestimates individual item capacity when people can use global representations of the display to detect such changes. When the ability to use such global ensemble or texture representations is reduced, people remember individual information about only 1-2 complex objects. This finding challenges models that propose people always remember a fixed number of objects, regardless of complexity, and supports a more flexible model with an important role for spatial ensemble representations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychologyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA)en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleNo Evidence for a Fixed Object Limit in Working Memory: Spatial Ensemble Representations Inflate Estimates of Working Memory Capacity for Complex Objects.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitionen_US
dc.date.available2019-09-13T14:42:26Z
dash.affiliation.otherFaculty of Arts & Sciencesen_US
dash.workflow.commentsThe doi link only gets to the abstract , but the pdf is fineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xlm0000075
dc.source.journalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
dash.source.volume41;3
dash.source.page921-929
dash.contributor.affiliatedAlvarez, George


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record