Approaches to Uncertainty in Exposure Assessment in Environmental Epidemiology
View/ Open
Author
Spiegelman, Donna
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103720Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Spiegelman, Donna. 2010. “Approaches to Uncertainty in Exposure Assessment in Environmental Epidemiology.” Annual Review of Public Health 31 (1): 149–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103720.Abstract
Uncertainty in assessment of individual exposure levels leads to bias, often, but not always, toward the null in estimates of health effects, and to underestimation of the variability of the estimates, leading to anticonservative p-values. In the absence of data on the uncertainty in individual exposure estimates, sensitivity analysis, also known as uncertainty analysis and bias analysis, is available. Hypothesized values of key parameters of the model relating the observed exposure to the true exposure are used to assess the resulting amount of bias in point and interval estimates. In general, the relative risk estimates can vary from zero to infinity as the hypothesized values of key parameters of the measurement error model vary. Thus, we recommend that exposure validation data be used to empirically adjust point and interval estimates of health effects for measurement error. The remainder of this review gives an overview of available methods for doing so. Just as we routinely adjust for confounding, we can and should routinely adjust for measurement error.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41384696
Collections
- SPH Scholarly Articles [6354]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)