Confidence Intervals for Heterogeneity Measures in Meta-analysis
7775 kwt060.pdf (178.3Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationTakkouche, B., P. Khudyakov, J. Costa-Bouzas, and D. Spiegelman. 2013. “Confidence Intervals for Heterogeneity Measures in Meta-Analysis.” American Journal of Epidemiology 178 (6): 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt060.
AbstractTwo methods of quantifying heterogeneity between studies in meta-analysis were studied. One method quantified the proportion of the total variance of the effect estimate due to variation between studies (R-I), and the other calibrated the variance between studies to the size of the effect itself through a between-study coefficient of variation (CVB). Bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for R-I and CVB were derived and evaluated in an extensive simulation study that covered a wide range of scenarios likely to be encountered in practice. The best performance was given by asymptotic Wald confidence intervals developed for R-I and CVB. The use of these heterogeneity measures together with their confidence intervals was illustrated in 5 typical meta-analyses. A new user-friendly SAS macro (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) is provided to implement these methods for routine use and can be downloaded at the last author's website.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41384717
- SPH Scholarly Articles