Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
View/ Open
Author
Aune, Dagfinn
Keum, NaNa
Giovannucci, Edward
Fadnes, Lars T.
Boffetta, Paolo
Greenwood, Darren C.
Tonstad, Serena
Vatten, Lars J.
Riboli, Elio
Norat, Teresa
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2716Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Aune, Dagfinn, NaNa Keum, Edward Giovannucci, Lars T Fadnes, Paolo Boffetta, Darren C Greenwood, Serena Tonstad, Lars J Vatten, Elio Riboli, and Teresa Norat. 2016. “Whole Grain Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and All Cause and Cause Specific Mortality: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.” BMJ, June, i2716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2716.Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the dose-response relation between consumption of whole grain and specific types of grains and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Embase searched up to 3 April 2016.STUDY SELECTIONProspective studies reporting adjusted relative risk estimates for the association between intake of whole grains or specific types of grains and cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all cause or cause specific mortality.DATA SYNTHESISSummary relative risks and 95% confidence intervals calculated with a random effects model. RESULTS 45 studies (64 publications) were included. The summary relative risks per 90 g/day increase in whole grain intake (90 g is equivalent to three servings-for example, two slices of bread and one bowl of cereal or one and a half pieces of pita bread made from whole grains) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.87; I-2=9%, n=7 studies) for coronary heart disease, 0.88 (0.75 to 1.03; I-2=56%, n=6) for stroke, and 0.78 (0.73 to 0.85; I-2=40%, n=10) for cardiovascular disease, with similar results when studies were stratified by whether the outcome was incidence or mortality. The relative risks for morality were 0.85 (0.80 to 0.91; I-2=37%, n=6) for total cancer, 0.83 (0.77 to 0.90; I-2=83%, n=11) for all causes, 0.78 (0.70 to 0.87; I-2=0%, n=4) for respiratory disease, 0.49 (0.23 to 1.05; I-2=85%, n=4) for diabetes, 0.74 (0.56 to 0.96; I-2=0%, n=3) for infectious diseases, 1.15 (0.66 to 2.02; I-2=79%, n=2) for diseases of the nervous system disease, and 0.78 (0.75 to 0.82; I-2=0%, n=5) for all non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes. Reductions in risk were observed up to an intake of 210-225 g/day (seven to seven and a half servings per day) for most of the outcomes. Intakes of specific types of whole grains including whole grain bread, whole grain breakfast cereals, and added bran, as well as total bread and total breakfast cereals were also associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular disease and/or all cause mortality, but there was little evidence of an association with refined grains, white rice, total rice, or total grains. CONCLUSION SThis meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grain intake is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and total cancer, and mortality from all causes, respiratory diseases, infectious diseases, diabetes, and all non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes. These findings support dietary guidelines that recommend increased intake of whole grain to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and premature mortality.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41392128
Collections
- SPH Scholarly Articles [6354]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)