Secondary Eclipse Photometry of Wasp-4b with Warmspitzer
View/ Open
Author
Beerer, Ingrid M.
Knutson, Heather A.
Burrows, Adam
Fortney, Jonathan J.
Agol, Eric
Charbonneau, David
Cowan, Nicolas B.
Deming, Drake
Desert, Jean-Michel
Langton, Jonathan
Laughlin, Gregory
Lewis, Nikole K.
Showman, Adam P.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/23Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Beerer, Ingrid M., Heather A. Knutson, Adam Burrows, Jonathan J. Fortney, Eric Agol, David Charbonneau, Nicolas B. Cowan, et al. 2010. “SECONDARY ECLIPSE PHOTOMETRY OF WASP-4b WITH WARMSPITZER.” The Astrophysical Journal 727 (1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/727/1/23.Abstract
We present photometry of the giant extrasolar planet WASP-4b at 3.6 and 4.5 mu m taken with the Infrared Array Camera on board the Spitzer Space Telescope as part of Spitzer's extended warm mission. We find secondary eclipse depths of 0.319% +/- 0.031% and 0.343% +/- 0.027% for the 3.6 and 4.5 mu m bands, respectively, and show model emission spectra and pressure-temperature profiles for the planetary atmosphere. These eclipse depths are well fit by model emission spectra with water and other molecules in absorption, similar to those used for TrES-3 and HD 189733b. Depending on our choice of model, these results indicate that this planet has either a weak dayside temperature inversion or no inversion at all. The absence of a strong thermal inversion on this highly irradiated planet is contrary to the idea that highly irradiated planets are expected to have inversions, perhaps due the presence of an unknown absorber in the upper atmosphere. This result might be explained by the modestly enhanced activity level of WASP-4b's G7V host star, which could increase the amount of UV flux received by the planet, therefore reducing the abundance of the unknown stratospheric absorber in the planetary atmosphere as suggested in Knutson et al. We also find no evidence for an offset in the timing of the secondary eclipse and place a 2 sigma upper limit on vertical bar e cos omega vertical bar of 0.0024, which constrains the range of tidal heating models that could explain this planet's inflated radius.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41397412
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18292]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)