The 2005 Outburst of the Halo Black Hole X‐Ray Transient XTE J1118+480
Author
Zurita, C.
Torres, M. A. P.
Steeghs, D.
Rodriguez-Gil, P.
Munoz-Darias, T.
Casares, J.
Shahbaz, T.
Martinez-Pais, I. G.
Zhao, P.
Garcia, M. R.
Piccioni, A.
Bartolini, C.
Guarnieri, A.
Bloom, J. S.
Blake, C. H.
Falco, E. E.
Szentgyorgyi, A.
Skrutskie, M.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/503286Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Zurita, C., M. A. P. Torres, D. Steeghs, P. Rodriguez‐Gil, T. Munoz‐Darias, J. Casares, T. Shahbaz, et al. 2006. “The 2005 Outburst of the Halo Black Hole X‐Ray Transient XTE J1118+480.” The Astrophysical Journal 644 (1): 432–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/503286.Abstract
We present optical and infrared monitoring of the 2005 outburst of the halo black hole X-ray transient XTE J1118+480. We measured a total outburst amplitude of similar to 5.7 +/- 0.1 mag in the R band and similar to 5 mag in the infrared J, H, and K-s bands. The hardness ratio HR2 (5-12 keV : 3-5 keV) from the RXTE ASM data is 1.53 +/- 0.02 at the peak of the outburst, indicating a hard spectrum. Both the shape of the light curve and the ratio L-X(1-10 keV)/ L-opt resemble the minioutbursts observed in GROJ0422+32 and XTE J1859+226. During early decline, we find a 0.02 mag amplitude variation consistent with a superhump modulation, like the one observed during the 2000 outburst. Similarly, XTE J1118+480 displayed a double-humped ellipsoidal modulation distorted by a superhump wave when settled into a near-quiescence level, suggesting that the disk expanded to the 3: 1 resonance radius after outburst, where it remained until early quiescence. The system reached quiescence at R = 19.02 +/- 0.03, about 3 months after the onset of the outburst. The optical rise preceded the X-ray rise by at most 4 days. The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) at the different epochs during outburst are all quasi - power laws with F-nu proportional to nu(alpha) increasing toward the blue. At the peak of the outburst, we derived alpha = 0.49 +/- 0.04 for the optical data alone and alpha = 0.1 +/- 0.1 when fitting solely the infrared. This difference between the optical and the infrared SEDs suggests that the infrared is dominated by a different component ( a jet?), whereas the optical is presumably showing the disk evolution.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41399946
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18292]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)