Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeeg, H. J.
dc.contributor.authorOcaña, B.
dc.contributor.authorKozhevnikov, V. P.
dc.contributor.authorCharbonneau, D.
dc.contributor.authorO'Donovan, F. T.
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, L. R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-27T13:18:51Z
dc.date.issued2008-03
dc.identifier.citationDeeg, H. J., B. Ocaña, V. P. Kozhevnikov, D. Charbonneau, F. T. O’Donovan, and L. R. Doyle. 2008. “Extrasolar Planet Detection by Binary Stellar Eclipse Timing: Evidence for a Third Body around CM Draconis.” Astronomy & Astrophysics 480 (2): 563–71. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079000.
dc.identifier.issn0004-6361
dc.identifier.issn1432-0746
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41417380*
dc.description.abstractAims. Our objective is to elucidate the physical process that causes the observed observed-minus-calculated (O-C) behavior in the M4.5/ M4.5 binary CM Dra and to test for any evidence of a third body around the CM Dra system.Methods. New eclipse minimum timings of CM Dra were obtained between the years 2000 and 2007. The O-C times of the system are fitted against several functions, representing different physical origins of the timing variations. Results. Using our observational data in conjunction with published timings going back to 1977, a clear non-linearity in O-C times is apparent. An analysis using model-selection statistics gives about equal weight to a parabolic and to a sinusoidal fitting function. Attraction from a third body, either at large distance in a quasi-constant constellation across the years of observations or from a body on a shorter orbit generating periodicities in O-C times is the most likely source of the observed O-C times. The white dwarf GJ 630.1B, a proper motion companion of CM Dra, can however be rejected as the responsible third body. Also, no further evidence of the short-periodic planet candidate described by Deeg et al. (2000, A&A, 358, L5) is found, whereas other mechanisms, such as period changes from stellar winds or Applegate's mechanism can be rejected. Conclusions. A third body, being either a few-Jupiter-mass object with a period of 18.5 +/- 4.5 years or an object in the mass range of 1.5 M-jup to 0.1 M-circle dot with periods of hundreds to thousands of years is the most likely origin of the observed minimum timing behavior.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEDP Sciences
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleExtrasolar planet detection by binary stellar eclipse timing: evidence for a third body around CM Draconis
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionVersion of Record
dc.relation.journalAstronomy and Astrophysics
dash.depositing.authorCharbonneau, David::a0e3ca75d3fb8511f2f554ed69428108::600
dc.date.available2019-09-27T13:18:51Z
dash.workflow.comments1Science Serial ID 10134
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/0004-6361:20079000
dash.source.volume480;2
dash.source.page563-571


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record