Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorSoutham-Gerow, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Bryce
dc.contributor.authorWheat, Emily
dc.contributor.authorTully, Carrie
dc.contributor.authorReise, Steven
dc.contributor.authorKendall, Philip
dc.contributor.authorWeisz, John
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T08:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-25
dc.identifier.citationBrown, Ruth C., Michael A. Southam-Gerow, Bryce D. McLeod, Emily B. Wheat, Carrie B. Tully, Steven P. Reise, Philip C. Kendall, and John R. Weisz. 2017. The Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment: Development and Initial Validation: 1-17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9762en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41426692*
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer-rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G-COMP) in the context of cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders. METHOD: Independent coders rated 744 sessions from a sample of 68 youth (mean age = 10.56 years) using the G-COMP and the instruments of alliance, involvement, CBT adherence, CBT competence. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability coefficients, ICC(2,2), were greater than .60 for the 5 G-COMP domain scores. G-COMP scores yielded small to medium correlations with instruments of alliance (rs = .17-.44) and youth involvement in treatment (rs = .08-.53), and medium to large correlations with instruments of CBT competence and adherence (rs = .26-.63). Therapists in the research setting were rated higher compared to newly trained therapists in community clinics. CONCLUSION:Preliminary reliability and validity of the G-COMP are promising, but future research is needed with non-CBT samples.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychologyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleThe Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment: Development and Initial Validationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical Psychologyen_US
dash.depositing.authorWeisz, John
dc.date.available2019-09-30T08:51:36Z
dash.workflow.commentsFAR2017en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jclp.22537
dc.source.journalJ. Clin. Psychol.
dash.source.volume74;4
dash.source.page649-664
dash.contributor.affiliatedWeisz, John


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record