Is Non-Consequentialism a Feature or a Bug?
View/ Open
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315530178-24Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cushman, Fiery. 2017. Is Non-Consequentialism a Feature or a Bug? In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind, ed. Julian Kiverstein. New York: Routledge.Abstract
Human moral values mix about nine parts function with one part flop. As psychologists, most of our time is spent trying to understand the flops. It is not that we neglect the functions entirely; they are well identified in the literature. Morality can promote cooperation (Nowak, 2006), decrease violence (Pinker, 2011), foster monogamy (Henrich, Boyd, & Richerson, 2012), protect property (Maynard Smith, 1982), promote trade (Henrich et al., 2010), and even improve our personal health (Rozin, 1997). We psychologists pay homage to the functions of morality with the regularity of a priest reciting an honored liturgy, and at least half the enthusiasm.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41426699
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18176]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)