Foot Callus Thickness Does Not Trade Off Protection for Tactile Sensitivity During Walking
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Mang’eni Ojiambo, Robert
MetadataShow full item record
CitationN.B. Holowka, B. Wynands, T.J. Drechsel, et al. 2019. Foot Callus Thickness Does Not Trade Off Protection for Tactile Sensitivity During Walking. Nature 571, 261–264.
AbstractUntil relatively recently, humans, like other animals, were habitually barefoot, hence the soles of our feet were the only direct contact between the body and the ground when walking. There is indirect evidence that simple footwear such as sandals and moccasins were first invented within the last 40 Ka, the oldest recovered footwear dates to 8 Ka, and inexpensive shoes with cushioned heels were not developed until the Industrial Revolution3. Because calluses, thickened and hardened areas of the epidermal layer of the skin, are the evolutionary solution to protecting the foot, we wondered if they differ from shoes in maintaining tactile sensitivity during walking, especially at initial foot contact to improve safety on surfaces that can be slippery, abrasive or otherwise injurious or uncomfortable. Here we show that, as expected, people from Kenya and the United States who frequently walk barefoot have thicker and harder calluses than those who typically use footwear. However, in contrast to shoes, callus thickness does not trade-off protection, measured as hardness and stiffness, for the ability to perceive tactile stimuli at frequencies experienced during walking. Additionally, unlike cushioned footwear, callus thickness does not affect how hard people’s feet strike the ground during walking, as indicated by impact forces. Along with providing protection and comfort at the cost of tactile sensitivity, cushioned footwear also lowers rates of loading at impact but increases force impulses, with unknown effects on the skeleton that merit future study.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42291263
- FAS Scholarly Articles