Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occurred: When is Your Vote Decisive?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occurred: When is Your Vote Decisive?

Citable link to this page


Title: Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occurred: When is Your Vote Decisive?
Author: King, Gary ORCID  0000-0002-5327-7631 ; Gelman, Andrew; Boscardin, John

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Gelman, Andrew, Gary King and John Boscardin. 1998. Estimating the probability of events that have never occurred: when is your vote decisive? Journal of the American Statistical Association 93(441): 1-9.
Full Text & Related Files:
Research Data:
Abstract: Researchers sometimes argue that statisticians have little to contribute when few realizations of the process being estimated are observed. We show that this argument is incorrect even in the extreme situation of estimating the probabilities of events so rare that
they have never occurred. We show how statistical forecasting models allow us to use empirical data to improve inferences about the probabilities of these events. Our application is estimating the probability that your vote will be decisive in a U.S. presidential election, a problem that has been studied by political scientists for more than two decades. The exact value of this probability is of only minor interest, but the number has important implications for understanding the optimal allocation of campaign resources, whether states and voter groups receive their fair share of attention from prospective presidents, and how formal "rational choice" models of voter behavior might be able to explain why people vote at all. We show how the probability of a decisive vote can be estimated empirically from state-level forecasts of the presidential election and illustrate with the example of 1992. Based on generalizations of standard political science forecasting models, we estimate the (prospective) probability of a single vote being decisive as about 1 in 10 million for close national elections such as 1992, varying by about a factor of 10 among states. Our results support the argument that subjective probabilities of many types are best obtained through empirically based statistical prediction models rather than solely through mathematical reasoning. We discuss the implications of our findings for the types of decision analyses used in public choice studies.
Published Version: doi:10.2307/2669597
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search