Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNagy, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T14:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationNagy, Gregory. 2008. Convergences and divergences between god and hero in the Mnesiepes Inscription of Paros. In Archilochus and his Age: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Archaeology of Paros and the Cyclades (Athens), ed. D. Katsonopoulou, I.Petropoulos, and S. Katsarou, 259-265. Athens: Archaeological Institute of Paros and Cyclades.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42665437*
dc.descriptionFee paid to publisher for online submission. Please contact me if you need further information.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn his pathfinding book, Archilochos Heros, Diskin Clay has questioned the applicability of a well-known formula for distinguishing between the cult of heroes and the cult of gods in archaic, classical, and postclassical Greek historical contexts.[1] The formula is derived from the use of the words thuein / theos and enagizein / hērōs by Herodotus (2.44.5) in distinguishing between one cult of Herakles as a god and another cult of Herakles as a hero. Both thuein and enagizein mean ‘sacrifice’, but the first word is associated with the practice of sacrificing to a theos ‘god’ and the second, to a hērōs ‘hero’. Herodotus observes that both of these cults are attested on the island-state of Thasos, daughter-city of Paros. As Clay argues, this neat divergence, seemingly applicable in the case of Herakles as worshipped at Thasos, does not apply in the case of another figure, Theogenes, who was likewise worshipped at Thasos. The worship of Theogenes at Thasos was not bipartite as in the case of Herakles. Rather, the worship of Theogenes was expressed in convergent wording that collapses the distinction between god and hero.[2] I argue that such a convergence of wording with reference to the cult of figures like Theogenes is appropriate to cult heroes as traditionally worshipped in hero cults throughout the Greek speaking world in the archaic, classical, and even post-classical periods. For example, in the wording of Herodotus (9.120.3) concerning the hero cult of Protesilaos and in the wording of Pausanias (9.39.12) concerning the hero cult of Trophonios, there are references to the cult hero as a theos ‘god’ in the context of imagining him in an afterlife. In my previous work I argued that such convergent wording is in fact typical of hero cults: the given cult hero is envisioned as a mortal in the preliminary phase of the ritual program of worship and then as a god in the central phase, at a climactic moment marking the hero’s epiphany to his worshippers.[3]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Classicsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherArchaeological Institute of Paros and Cycladesen_US
dc.relationArchilochus and his Age IIen_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hlnc.essay:Nagy.Convergences_and_Divergences_between_God_and_Hero.2008en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/5700en_US
dash.licenseOAP
dc.titleConvergences and Divergences Between God and Hero in the Mnesiepes Inscription of Parosen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalArchilochus and his Age: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Archaeology of Paros and the Cyclades (Athens)en_US
dash.depositing.authorNagy, Gregory
dc.date.available2020-05-12T14:30:10Z
dash.affiliation.otherFaculty of Arts & Sciencesen_US
dash.contributor.affiliatedNagy, Gregory


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record