Why Prioritize When There Isn't Enough Money?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Why Prioritize When There Isn't Enough Money?

Citable link to this page


Title: Why Prioritize When There Isn't Enough Money?
Author: Wikler, Daniel I.
Citation: Wikler, Daniel. 2003. Why prioritize when there isn't enough money?. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1:5.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In an informal address to the 4th International Conference on Priorities in Health (Oslo, 23 September 2002), Professor Jeffrey Sachs--Chairperson of the WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health--maintained that the real causes of the inability of the world's poorest people to receive help for the lethal diseases that burden them did not include the "usual suspects" (corruption, mismanagement, and wrong priorities). Rather, the root cause was argued to be an inherent lack of money, indicating that the burden of disease would be lifted only if rich countries gave more money to poor ones. Without taking exception to anything that Sachs said in his address, there nevertheless remain a number of justifications for efforts to improve priority setting in the face of severely shortages of resources, including the following three defenses: prioritization is needed if we are to know that prioritization is insufficient; prioritization is most important when there is little money; prioritization can itself increase resources.
Published Version: doi://10.1186/1478-7547-1-5
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156024/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4551775
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search