Limitations of Remotely Sensed Aerosol as a Spatial Proxy for Fine Particulate Matter

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Limitations of Remotely Sensed Aerosol as a Spatial Proxy for Fine Particulate Matter

Citable link to this page


Title: Limitations of Remotely Sensed Aerosol as a Spatial Proxy for Fine Particulate Matter
Author: Paciorek, Christopher Joseph; Liu, Yang

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Paciorek, Christopher J., and Yang Liu. 2009. Limitations of remotely sensed aerosol as a spatial proxy for fine particulate matter. Environmental Health Perspectives 117(6): 904-909.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Recent research highlights the promise of remotely sensed aerosol optical depth (AOD) as a proxy for ground-level particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5). Particular interest lies in estimating spatial heterogeneity using AOD, with important application to estimating pollution exposure for public health purposes. Given the correlations reported between AOD and PM2.5, it is tempting to interpret the spatial patterns in AOD as reflecting patterns in PM2.5. Objectives: We evaluated the degree to which AOD can help predict long-term average PM2.5 concentrations for use in chronic health studies. Methods: We calculated correlations of AOD and PM2.5 at various temporal aggregations in the eastern United States in 2004 and used statistical models to assess the relationship between AOD and PM2.5 and the potential for improving predictions of PM2.5 in a subregion, the mid-Atlantic. Results: We found only limited spatial associations of AOD from three satellite retrievals with daily and yearly PM2.5. The statistical modeling shows that monthly average AOD poorly reflects spatial patterns in PM2.5 because of systematic, spatially correlated discrepancies between AOD and PM2.5. Furthermore, when we included AOD as a predictor of monthly PM2.5 in a statistical prediction model, AOD provided little additional information in a model that already accounts for land use, emission sources, meteorology, and regional variability. Conclusions: These results suggest caution in using spatial variation in currently available AOD to stand in for spatial variation in ground-level PM2.5 in epidemiologic analyses and indicate that when PM2.5 monitoring is available, careful statistical modeling outperforms the use of AOD.
Published Version: doi:10.1289/ehp.0800360
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search