Colorectal Cancer Prevention for Low-income, Sociodemographically-diverse Adults in Public Housing: Baseline Findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Colorectal Cancer Prevention for Low-income, Sociodemographically-diverse Adults in Public Housing: Baseline Findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Colorectal Cancer Prevention for Low-income, Sociodemographically-diverse Adults in Public Housing: Baseline Findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Author: McNeill, Lorna H; Coeling, Molly; Puleo, Elaine; Suarez, Elizabeth Gonzalez; Bennett, Gary G.; Emmons, Karen Maria

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: McNeill, Lorna H., Molly Coeling, Elaine Puleo, Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez, Gary G. Bennett, and Karen M. Emmons. 2009. Colorectal cancer prevention for low-income, sociodemographically-diverse adults in public housing: baseline findings of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 9:353.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: This paper presents the study design, intervention components, and baseline data from Open Doors to Health, a study designed to address social contextual factors in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention for low-income, racial/ethnic minority populations. Methods: A cluster randomized design with 12 housing sites as the primary sampling units was used: 6 sites were assigned to a "Peer-led plus Screening Access" (PL) condition, and 6 were assigned to "Screening Access only" (SCR) condition. Study-related outcomes were CRC screening, physical activity (measured as mean steps/day), and multivitamin use. Results: At baseline (unweighted sample size = 1554), two-thirds self-reported that they were current with screening recommendations for CRC (corrected for medical records validation, prevalence was 52%), with half having received a colonoscopy (54%); 96% had health insurance. Mean steps per day was 5648 (se mean = 224), and on average 28% of the sample reported regular multivitamin use. Residents reported high levels of social support [mean = 4.40 (se = .03)] and moderately extensive social networks [mean = 2.66 (se = .02)]. Conclusion: Few studies have conducted community-based studies in public housing communities; these data suggest areas for improvement and future opportunities for intervention development and dissemination. Findings from the randomized trial will determine the effectiveness of the intervention on our health-related outcomes as well as inform future avenues of research.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-353
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754465/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4589706
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters