Ambulatory Measurement of Knee Motion and Physical Activity: Preliminary Evaluation of a Smart Activity Monitor

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Ambulatory Measurement of Knee Motion and Physical Activity: Preliminary Evaluation of a Smart Activity Monitor

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Ambulatory Measurement of Knee Motion and Physical Activity: Preliminary Evaluation of a Smart Activity Monitor
Author: Huddleston, James; Alaiti, Amer; Goldvasser, Dov; Scarborough, Donna; Krebs, David; Freiberg, Andrew; Rubash, Harry E.; Malchau, Henrik; Harris, William Hamilton

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Huddleston, James, Amer Alaiti, Dov Goldvasser, Donna Scarborough, Andrew Freiberg, Harry Rubash, Henrik Malchau, William Harris, and David Krebs. 2006. Ambulatory measurement of knee motion and physical activity: preliminary evaluation of a smart activity monitor. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 3:21.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: There is currently a paucity of devices available for continuous, long-term monitoring of human joint motion. Non-invasive, inexpensive devices capable of recording human activity and joint motion have many applications for medical research. Such a device could be used to quantify range of motion outside the gait laboratory. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the modified Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEEA) in measuring knee flexion angles, to detect different physical activities, and to quantify how often healthy subjects use deep knee flexion in the ambulatory setting. Methods: We compared Biomotion Laboratory (BML) "gold standard" data to simultaneous IDEEA measures of knee motion and gait, step up/down, and stair descent in 5 healthy subjects. In addition, we used a series of choreographed physical activities outside the BML to confirm the IDEEA's ability to accurately measure 7 commonly-performed physical activities. Subjects then continued data collection during ordinary activities outside the gait laboratory. Results: Pooled correlations between the BML and IDEEA knee flexion angles were .97 +/- .03 for step up/down, .98 +/- .02 for stair descent, and .98 +/- .01 for gait. In the BML protocol, the IDEEA accurately identified gait, but was less accurate in identifying step up/down and stair descent. During sampling outside the BML, the IDEEA accurately detected walking, running, stair ascent, stair descent, standing, lying, and sitting. On average, subjects flexed their knees >120° for 0.17% of their data collection periods outside the BML. Conclusion: The modified IDEEA system is a useful clinical tool for evaluating knee motion and multiple physical activities in the ambulatory setting. These five healthy subjects rarely flexed their knees >120°.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-21
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1592500/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4632770
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters