Patterns of Abdominal Fat Distribution

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Patterns of Abdominal Fat Distribution

Citable link to this page


Title: Patterns of Abdominal Fat Distribution
Author: Massaro, Joseph M.; Lieb, Kathrin; Vasan, Ramachandran S.; Pou, Karla Michelle; Hoffmann, Udo; O'Donnell, Christopher Joseph; Fox, Caroline

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Pou, Karla M., Joseph M. Massaro, Udo Hoffmann, Kathrin Lieb, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Christopher J. O'Donnell, and Caroline S. Fox. 2009. Patterns of Abdominal Fat Distribution. Diabetes Care 32(3): 481-485.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: OBJECTIVE—The prevalence of abdominal obesity exceeds that of general obesity. We sought to determine the prevalence of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral obesity and to characterize the different patterns of fat distribution in a community-based sample. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Participants from the Framingham Heart Study (n = 3,348, 48% women, mean age 52 years) underwent multidetector computed tomography; subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volumes were assessed. Sex-specific high SAT and VAT definitions were based on 90th percentile cut points from a healthy referent sample. Metabolic risk factors were examined in subgroups with elevated SAT and VAT. RESULTS—The prevalence of high SAT was 30% (women) and 31% (men) and that for high VAT was 44% (women) and 42% (men). Overall, 27.8% of the sample was discordant for high SAT and high VAT: 19.9% had SAT less than but VAT equal to or greater than the 90th percentile, and 7.9% had SAT greater than but VAT less than the 90th percentile. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher among women and men with SAT less than the 90th percentile and high VAT than in those with high SAT but VAT less than the 90th percentile, despite lower BMI and waist circumference. Findings were similar for hypertension, elevated triglycerides, and low HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS—Nearly one-third of our sample has abdominal subcutaneous obesity, and <40% have visceral obesity. Clinical measures of BMI and waist circumference may misclassify individuals in terms of VAT and metabolic risk.
Published Version: doi:10.2337/dc08-1359
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search