Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTruog, Robert David
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-18T18:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationTruog, Robert D. 2007. Doing research on the ethics of doing research. Critical Care 11(1): 111.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4744868
dc.description.abstractIn the previous issue of Critical Care Chenaud and colleagues found that most intensive care unit patients who had given informed consent for their participation in a clinical trial could not recall either the purpose of the trial or its related risks several days later. These findings should remind us that informed consent is a process, not an event, but they should not be interpreted to mean that recall is, of itself, a useful criterion for evaluating either the validity or the quality of the informed consent process. On an entirely separate note, the decision of the authors not to obtain informed consent for this study itself raises interesting questions about the ethics of doing research on the ethics of doing research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1186/cc5684en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151858/pdf/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleDoing Research on the Ethics of Doing Researchen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalCritical Careen_US
dash.depositing.authorTruog, Robert David
dc.date.available2011-03-18T18:30:02Z
dash.affiliation.otherHMS^Global Health and Social Medicineen_US
dash.affiliation.otherHMS^Anaesthesia-Children's Hospitalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/cc5684*
dash.contributor.affiliatedTruog, Robert


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record