Comparisons of the M1 Genome Segments and Encoded μ2 Proteins of Different Reovirus Isolates

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Comparisons of the M1 Genome Segments and Encoded μ2 Proteins of Different Reovirus Isolates

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Comparisons of the M1 Genome Segments and Encoded μ2 Proteins of Different Reovirus Isolates
Author: Keirstead, Natalie D; Broering, Teresa J; Arnold, Michelle M; Coombs, Kevin M; Nibert, Max Lee; Parker, John SL; Yin, Peng

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Yin, Peng, Natalie D Keirstead, Teresa J Broering, Michelle M Arnold, John SL Parker, Max L Nibert, and Kevin M Coombs. 2004. Comparisons of the M1 genome segments and encoded μ2 proteins of different reovirus isolates. Virology Journal 1: 6.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: The reovirus M1 genome segment encodes the μ2 protein, a structurally minor component of the viral core, which has been identified as a transcriptase cofactor, nucleoside and RNA triphosphatase, and microtubule-binding protein. The μ2 protein is the most poorly understood of the reovirus structural proteins. Genome segment sequences have been reported for 9 of the 10 genome segments for the 3 prototypic reoviruses type 1 Lang (T1L), type 2 Jones (T2J), and type 3 Dearing (T3D), but the M1 genome segment sequences for only T1L and T3D have been previously reported. For this study, we determined the M1 nucleotide and deduced μ2 amino acid sequences for T2J, nine other reovirus field isolates, and various T3D plaque-isolated clones from different laboratories. Results: Determination of the T2J M1 sequence completes the analysis of all ten genome segments of that prototype. The T2J M1 sequence contained a 1 base pair deletion in the 3' non-translated region, compared to the T1L and T3D M1 sequences. The T2J M1 gene showed ~80% nucleotide homology, and the encoded μ2 protein showed ~71% amino acid identity, with the T1L and T3D M1 and μ2 sequences, respectively, making the T2J M1 gene and μ2 proteins amongst the most divergent of all reovirus genes and proteins. Comparisons of these newly determined M1 and μ2 sequences with newly determined M1 and μ2 sequences from nine additional field isolates and a variety of laboratory T3D clones identified conserved features and/or regions that provide clues about μ2 structure and function. Conclusions: The findings suggest a model for the domain organization of μ2 and provide further evidence for a role of μ2 in viral RNA synthesis. The new sequences were also used to explore the basis for M1/μ2-determined differences in the morphology of viral factories in infected cells. The findings confirm the key role of Ser/Pro208 as a prevalent determinant of differences in factory morphology among reovirus isolates and trace the divergence of this residue and its associated phenotype among the different laboratory-specific clones of type 3 Dearing.
Published Version: doi://10.1186/1743-422X-1-6
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC524354/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4866413
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters