It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation

DSpace/Manakin Repository

It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation
Author: Star, Jon R; Rittle-Johnson, Bethany

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Star, Jon R., and Bethany Rittle-Johnson. 2009. It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, no. 4: 408-426.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Comparing and contrasting examples is a core cognitive process that supports learning in children and adults across a variety of topics. In this experimental study, we evaluated the benefits of supporting comparison in a classroom context for children learning about computational estimation. Fifth- and sixth-grade students (n = 157) learned about estimation either by comparing alternative solution strategies or by reflecting on the strategies one at a time. At posttest and retention test, students who compared were more flexible problem solvers on a variety of measures. Comparison also supported greater conceptual knowledge, but only for students who already knew some estimation strategies. These findings indicate that comparison is an effective learning and instructional practice in a domain with multiple acceptable answers.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.004
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4889485
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters