Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKabrhel, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorSacco, Weston
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Shan Woo
dc.contributor.authorHariharan, Praveen
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T15:08:04Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationKabrhel, Christopher, Weston Sacco, Shan Liu, and Praveen Hariharan. 2010. Outcomes considered most important by emergency physicians when determining disposition of patients with pulmonary embolism. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 3(4): 239-264.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1865-1372en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5146969
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Clinical decision rules for the disposition of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are typically validated against an outcome of 30-day mortality or disease recurrence. There is little justification for this time frame, nor is it clear whether this outcome reflects emergency department (ED) decision making. Aims: To determine which outcomes emergency physicians (EP) consider most relevant to disposition decisions. Methods: Survey of attending EPs in geographically diverse US states using acute PE as the diagnostic framework. Responses required single-answer multiple choice, a numerical percentage, rank-ordered responses, or a five-point Likert scale. We distributed the survey via e-mail to 608 EPs. Results: We received responses from 292 (48%) EPs: 88% board certified, 91% trained in emergency medicine, and 70% work in academics. Respondents reported discharging 1% of patients with PE from the ED, but 21% reported being asked to do so by an admitting service. EPs were more interested in knowing 5-day (in hospital) outcomes [192/265, 72% (95% exact CI=66%–78%)] than 30-day outcomes [39/261, 15% (95% exact CI=11%–20%)] or 90-day outcomes [29/263, 11% (95% exact CI=8%–15%)]. On a Likert scale, 212/241 (88%, 95% exact CI=83%–92%) agreed or strongly agreed that they considered 5-day (in hospital) clinical deterioration when making a decision to admit or discharge a patient from the ED compared to 184/242 (76%, 95% exact CI=70%–81%) and 73/242 (30%, 95% exact CI=24%–36%) for 30 and 90 days, respectively. A wide variety of clinical outcomes beyond death or recurrent PE were considered indicative of clinical deterioration. Conclusions: Five-day (in hospital) outcomes that incorporate a variety of clinical deterioration events are of interest to EPs when determining the disposition of ED patients with PE. Researchers should consider this when developing and validating clinical decision rules.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1007/s12245-010-0206-8en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047862/pdf/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectclinical decision ruleen_US
dc.subjectoutcomesen_US
dc.subjectemergency departmenten_US
dc.subjectpulmonary embolismen_US
dc.subjectvenous thromboembolismen_US
dc.titleOutcomes Considered Most Important by Emergency Physicians When Determining Disposition of Patients with Pulmonary Embolismen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Emergency Medicineen_US
dash.depositing.authorKabrhel, Christopher
dc.date.available2011-09-29T15:08:04Z
dash.affiliation.other100170en_US
dash.affiliation.other100170en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12245-010-0206-8*
dash.contributor.affiliatedLiu, Shan
dash.contributor.affiliatedKabrhel, Christopher


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record