High Quality Care and Ethical Pay-for-performance: A Society of General Internal Medicine Policy Analysis
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Farber, Neil J.
Rask, Kimberly J.
Figaro, M. Kathleen
Sulmasy, Daniel P.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWharam, J. Frank, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Neil J. Farber, Christine Sinsky, Lisa Rucker, Kimberly J. Rask, M. Kathleen Figaro, Clarence Braddock, Michael J. Barry, and Daniel P. Sulmasy. 2009. High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a society of general internal medicine policy analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(7): 854-859.
AbstractBACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance is proliferating, yet its impact on key stakeholders remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The Society of General Internal Medicine systematically evaluated ethical issues raised by performance-based physician compensation. RESULTS: We conclude that current arrangements are based on fundamentally acceptable ethical principles, but are guided by an incomplete understanding of health-care quality. Furthermore, their implementation without evidence of safety and efficacy is ethically precarious because of potential risks to stakeholders, especially vulnerable patients. CONCLUSION: We propose four major strategies to transition from risky pay-for-performance systems to ethical performance-based physician compensation and high quality care. These include implementing safeguards within current pay-for-performance systems, reaching consensus regarding the obligations of key stakeholders in improving health-care quality, developing valid and comprehensive measures of health-care quality, and utilizing a cautious evaluative approach in creating the next generation of compensation systems that reward genuine quality.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5346784
- HMS Scholarly Articles