Search
Now showing items 21-30 of 115
Inequality and Indignation
(2002)
Inequalities often persist because both the advantaged and the disadvantaged stand to lose from change. Despite the probability of loss, moral indignation can lead the disadvantaged to seek to alter the status quo, by ...
Is There a Constitutional Right to Clone?
(2002)
Recent scientific innovations, and proposed legislation, have raised questions about the nature of the constitutional right to reproductive freedom, and in particular about whether there is a constitutional “right to clone.” ...
Avoiding Absurdity? A New Canon in Regulatory Law
(The Law School of the University of Chicago, 2002)
Courts have recently developed a new principle of interpretation: Administrative agencies are not bound by the literal language of regulatory statutes, if they are attempting to ensure against absurd or patently unreasonable ...
The Rights of Animals: A Very Short Primer
(2002)
Do animals have rights? Almost everyone believes in animal rights, at least in some minimal sense; the real question is what that phrase actually means. By exploring that question, it is possible to give a clear sense of ...
Television and the Public Interest
(California Law Review, 2000)
The communications revolution has thrown into question the value of public interest obligations for television broadcasters. But the distinctive nature of this unusual market--with "winner- take-all" features, with viewers ...
Willingness to Pay versus Welfare
(Harvard University, Harvard Law School, 2007)
Economists often analyze questions of law and policy by reference to the criterion of private willingness to pay (WTP), with the belief that people’s WTP for a good is an accurate proxy for the welfare that they would ...
Culture and Government Money: A Guide for the Perplexed
(2000)
Constitutional limits on government’s power to regulate the culture and the arts, newly salient in light of the controversy involving the Brooklyn Museum, are best understood by distinguishing among (a) content-neutral, ...
Judging National Security post-9/11: An Empirical Investigation
(2008)
Many people believe that when national security is threatened, federal courts should defer to the government. Many other people believe that in times of crisis, citizens are vulnerable to a kind of "panic" that leads to ...