Uncomfortable Arithmetic — Whom to Cover versus What to Cover

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Uncomfortable Arithmetic — Whom to Cover versus What to Cover

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Uncomfortable Arithmetic — Whom to Cover versus What to Cover
Author: Baicker, Katherine; Chandra, Amitabh

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Baicker, Katherine, and Amitabh Chandra. 2009. Uncomfortable Arithmetic — Whom to Cover versus What to Cover. New England Journal of Medicine 362(2):95-97.
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Much of the current debate about expanding health insurance coverage avoids addressing an uncomfortable trade-off: with a limited budget, making benefits more generous means being able to cover fewer people. Moreover, designing insurance benefits that are limited to coverage of higher-value care but are extended to more people will generate greater improvements in health than providing unlimited care for fewer people. Policymakers and patient advocates are reluctant to acknowledge that in a world of scarce resources it will not be enough to eliminate waste: we will have to make active choices in our public insurance programs between increasing the number of people covered and increasing the generosity of that coverage.
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0911074
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8057325
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters