Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenjamin, Sara E
dc.contributor.authorCradock, Angie Lynn
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Elizabeth M.
dc.contributor.authorSlining, Meghan
dc.contributor.authorGillman, Matthew William
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-12T01:36:38Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationBenjamin, Sara E., Angie Cradock, Elizabeth M. Walker, Meghan Slining, and Matthew W. Gillman. 2008. Obesity prevention in child care: A review of U.S. state regulations. BMC Public Health 8: 188.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8156560
dc.description.abstractObjective: To describe and contrast individual state nutrition and physical activity regulations related to childhood obesity for child care centers and family child care homes in the United States. Methods: We conducted a review of regulations for child care facilities for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We examined state regulations and recorded key nutrition and physical activity items that may contribute to childhood obesity. Items included in this review were: 1) Water is freely available; 2) Sugar-sweetened beverages are limited; 3) Foods of low nutritional value are limited; 4) Children are not forced to eat; 5) Food is not used as a reward; 6) Support is provided for breastfeeding and provision of breast milk; 7) Screen time is limited; and 8) Physical activity is required daily. Results: Considerable variation exists among state nutrition and physical activity regulations related to obesity. Tennessee had six of the eight regulations for child care centers, and Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, and Nevada had five of the eight regulations. Conversely, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Nebraska and Washington had none of the eight regulations. For family child care homes, Georgia and Nevada had five of the eight regulations; Arizona, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, and West Virginia had four of the eight regulations. California, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska did not have any of the regulations related to obesity for family child care homes. Conclusion: Many states lack specific nutrition and physical activity regulations related to childhood obesity for child care facilities. If widely implemented, enhancing state regulations could help address the obesity epidemic in young children in the United States.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-188en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438347/pdf/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleObesity Prevention in Child Care: A Review of U.S. State Regulationsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Public Healthen_US
dash.depositing.authorGillman, Matthew William
dc.date.available2012-02-12T01:36:38Z
dash.affiliation.otherSPH^Society Human Development and Healthen_US
dash.affiliation.otherHMS^Population Medicineen_US
dash.affiliation.otherSPH^Nutritionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-8-188*
dash.contributor.affiliatedCradock, Angie
dash.contributor.affiliatedGillman, Matthew


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record