Sexual Coercion by Male Chimpanzees Shows That Female Choice May Be More Apparent than Real

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Sexual Coercion by Male Chimpanzees Shows That Female Choice May Be More Apparent than Real

Citable link to this page


Title: Sexual Coercion by Male Chimpanzees Shows That Female Choice May Be More Apparent than Real
Author: Muller, Martin N.; Thompson, Melissa Emery; Kahlenberg, Sonya Marie; Wrangham, Richard W.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Muller, Martin N., Melissa Emery Thompson, Sonya M. Kahlenberg, and Richard W. Wrangham. 2011. Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(5): 921-933.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The extent to which active female mating preferences influence male reproductive success in mammals is unclear, particularly for promiscuously breeding species like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Previous studies from multiple long-term study sites have shown that female chimpanzees mate more restrictively around ovulation, and this has been taken as evidence for female choice. However, none of these studies rigorously evaluated the alternative hypothesis that restrictive mating results not from unconstrained choice, but in response to coercive mate guarding, in which males use punishment and intimidation to reduce female promiscuity and promote their own mating interests. Nor did they consider evidence for the potential genetic or phenotypic benefits that females might be choosing. Using 11 years of data from the Kanyawara community in Kibale National Park, Uganda, we previously demonstrated that males achieve elevated mating success with those females toward whom they direct high levels of aggression. Here we extend those findings to show that even female copulatory approaches, which have previously been attributed to female choice, are correlated with male aggression. Specifically, individual females at our site initiated periovulatory copulations most frequently with the males who were most aggressive toward them throughout their cycles. Those males showed high rates of aggression toward females throughout estrus, despite achieving high copulation rates, demonstrating a continuing conflict of interest over the exclusivity of mating access. Because sexual coercion is potentially widespread in primates and other mammals, our results stress the importance of considering the influence of male aggression in studies of female choice.
Published Version: doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1093-y
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search