Cost analysis of school-based intermittent screening and treatment of malaria in Kenya

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Cost analysis of school-based intermittent screening and treatment of malaria in Kenya

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Cost analysis of school-based intermittent screening and treatment of malaria in Kenya
Author: Drake, Thomas L.; Okello, George; Njagi, Kiambo; Halliday, Katherine E.; Jukes, Matthew; Mangham, Lindsay; Brooker, Simon

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Drake, Thomas L., George Okello, Kiambo Njagi, Katherine E Halliday, Matthew CH Jukes, Lindsay Mangham, and Simon Brooker. 2011. Cost analysis of school-based intermittent screening and treatment of malaria in Kenya. Malaria Journal 10:273.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background:
The control of malaria in schools is receiving increasing attention, but there remains currently no consensus as to the optimal intervention strategy. This paper analyses the costs of intermittent screening and treatment (IST) of malaria in schools, implemented as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on the Kenyan coast.
Methods:
Financial and economic costs were estimated using an ingredients approach whereby all resources required in the delivery of IST are quantified and valued. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate how programme variation affects costs and to identify potential cost savings in the future implementation of IST.
Results:
The estimated financial cost of IST per child screened is US$ 6.61 (economic cost US$ 6.24). Key contributors to cost were salary costs (36%) and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) (22%). Almost half (47%) of the intervention cost comprises redeployment of existing resources including health worker time and use of hospital vehicles. Sensitivity analysis identified changes to intervention delivery that can reduce programme costs by 40%, including use of alternative RDTs and removal of supervised treatment. Cost-effectiveness is also likely to be highly sensitive to the proportion of children found to be RDT-positive.
Conclusion:
In the current context, school-based IST is a relatively expensive malaria intervention, but reducing the complexity of delivery can result in considerable savings in the cost of intervention.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-273
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8458029
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters