When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation

View/ Open
Author
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186?journalCode=mnscMetadata
Show full item recordCitation
Bohnet, Iris, Alexandra van Geen, and Max Bazerman. "When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation." Management Science 62, no. 5 (May 2016): 1225–1234.Abstract
We examine a new intervention to overcome gender biases in hiring, promotion, and job assignments: an “evaluation nudge,” in which people are evaluated jointly rather than separately regarding their future performance. Evaluators are more likely to focus on individual performance in joint than in separate evaluation and on group stereotypes in separate than in joint evaluation, making joint evaluation the money-maximizing evaluation procedure. Our findings are compatible with a behavioral model of information processing and with the System 1/System 2 distinction in behavioral decision research where people have two distinct modes of thinking that are activated under certain conditions.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8506867
Collections
- HBS Scholarly Articles [827]
- HKS Faculty Scholarship [747]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)