Nondense Mammographic Area and Risk of Breast Cancer

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Nondense Mammographic Area and Risk of Breast Cancer

Citable link to this page


Title: Nondense Mammographic Area and Risk of Breast Cancer
Author: Pettersson, Andreas; Hankinson, Susan Elizabeth; Willett, Walter C.; Lagiou, Pagona; Trichopoulos, Dimitrios; Tamimi, Rulla May

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Pettersson, Andreas, Susan E Hankinson, Walter C Willett, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, and Rulla M Tamimi. 2011. Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 13(5): R100.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Introduction: The mechanisms underlying the strong association between percentage dense area on a mammogram and the risk of breast cancer are unknown. We investigated separately the absolute dense area and the absolute nondense area on mammograms in relation to breast cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study on prediagnostic mammographic density measurements and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study and the Nurses' Health Study II. Premenopausal mammograms were available from 464 cases and 998 controls, and postmenopausal mammograms were available from 960 cases and 1,662 controls. We used a computer-assisted thresholding technique to measure mammographic density, and we used unconditional logistic regression to calculate OR and 95% CI data. Results: Higher absolute dense area was associated with a greater risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (OR\(_{\text{tertile 3 vs 1}}\) = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.77) and among postmenopausal women (OR\(_{\text{quintile 5 vs 1}}\) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.65 to 2.89). However, increasing absolute nondense area was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (OR\(_{\text{tertile 3 vs 1}}\) = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.72) and among postmenopausal women (OR\(_{\text{quintile 5 vs 1}}\) = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.62). These associations changed minimally when we included both absolute dense area and absolute nondense area in the same statistical model. As expected, the percentage dense area was the strongest risk factor for breast cancer in both groups. Conclusions: Our results indicate that absolute dense area is independently and positively associated with breast cancer risk, whereas absolute nondense area is independently and inversely associated with breast cancer risk. Since adipose tissue is radiographically nondense, these results suggest that adipose breast tissue may have a protective role in breast carcinogenesis.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/bcr3041
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search